Register, or Login to view the article
December 18, 2020 – The Debtors filed their First Amended Plan and Disclosure Statement, including blacklines of each showing changes to the versions filed on November 6, 2020 [Docket No. 749]
On the same day, the Debtors further filed a revised proposed Disclosure Statement Order, which shows changes from the original proposed order made to address certain comments received [Docket No. 750].
The Amended Plan specifies the amount of distribution earmarked for holders of General Unsecured Claims. Under the Amended Plan, each holder of General Unsecured Claims will receive its Pro Rata share of no less than $3.0mn (the “Class 4 Aggregate Cash Distribution”).
The Amended Plan [Docket No. 749] further adds a “Statement from the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors” that states, "The Creditors' Committee does not support the Plan and recommends that Class 4 creditors vote no." (See more on Committee statement below).
The Disclosure Statement [Docket No. 749] notes, “Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors engaged in extensive, good-faith negotiations with their Prepetition Secured Creditors to develop a comprehensive financing, restructuring and recapitalization plan to be implemented through these Chapter 11 Cases. That agreement was memorialized in the Restructuring Support Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit B, executed by the Debtors and the Prepetition Secured Creditors. The Debtors and the Prepetition Secured Creditors determined that it was the best option for the Debtors to file for chapter 11 with an agreement on a Plan that provides the possibility of recoveries to all of the Debtors’ stakeholders and allows the Debtors to undertake the necessary financial and operational restructurings.
The Plan reflects the agreement reached with the Prepetition Secured Creditors to reorganize the Debtors as a going-concern business, back-stopped by a parallel sale process. The Debtors and the Prepetition Secured Creditors believe that the financial restructurings, the operational restructuring (through, among other things, focused lease rejections) and the other transactions reflected in the Plan will position the Reorganized Debtors well to succeed post emergence from bankruptcy. With a sustainable business plan and adequate operating liquidity, the Reorganized Debtors will be positioned to compete more effectively in the evolving restaurant industry."
The following is an updated summary of classes, claims, voting rights and expected recoveries (defined terms are as defined in the Plan and/or Disclosure Statement):
In respect of the Committee's statement that it does not support confirmation of the Plan, the Amended Disclosure Statement provides, "Since the Creditors’ Committee’s formation, it has been engaged in diligence concerning the Debtors’ assets as well as discussions with the Prepetition Secured Creditors and the DIP Lenders and the Debtors on a global resolution that would provide for what the Creditors’ Committee believes would be fair and equitable treatment for all general unsecured creditors under either a sale of assets or any proposed reorganization of the Debtors pursuant to the Plan. To date, those discussions have not resulted in any agreement.
The Creditors’ Committee believes that there are meaningful unencumbered assets (including the funds from the rabbi trusts) which can provide a fair recovery to general unsecured creditors. In addition, the Creditors’ Committee believes that there may be various causes of actions that should not be released (discussed in more detail below) that could also provide a recovery to general unsecured creditors. As such, the Creditors’ Committee does not believe that the proposed treatment of general unsecured creditors in the Plan is fair or appropriate and does not support acceptance of the Plan absent modification that would include global settlement or otherwise acceptable treatment for general unsecured creditors. The Creditors’ Committee hopes to continue to work with the Debtors, the Prepetition Secured Creditors and the DIP Lenders on a global resolution. If a global resolution is reached, the Creditors’ Committee would work with all parties to have such resolution publicized and alter its recommendation….
The Creditors’ Committee has submitted certain informal document requests to the Debtors and NRD to diligence the Merger, among other NRD transactions and NRD’s control of and interactions with the Debtors. While the Debtors have produced some documents, the Creditors’ Committee awaits production of additional documents from both Debtors and from NRD. Moreover, the Creditors’ Committee understands that the Debtors performed a high-level review of the transactions involving NRD – but the independent directors have not done so, deferring such investigation to the Creditors’ Committee. The Creditors’ Committee is still investigating and continues to follow up with Debtors and NRD concerning outstanding documents. At this time, therefore, the Creditors’ Committee does not support a release of NRD and its Related Persons without further information and a contribution from those parties as consideration for the release from any potential claims or actions. Alternatively, causes of action against NRD should be placed into a trust for the benefit of general unsecured creditors.
In addition, the Plan provides for unsecured creditors to be deemed Releasing Parties unless they affirmatively opt-out of the release. General unsecured creditors should read the release provisions carefully as well as the information on the ballot. If you do not wish to be a Releasing Party, you must return the ballot AND check the opt-out box of the release. Otherwise, you will be deemed a Releasing Party. The Committee submits that the release provisions are not appropriate and reserve all rights on this issue at Confirmation."
The Disclosure Statement [Docket No. 749] attached the following documents:
Prepetition and Post-Emergence Capital Structure
As of the Petition date, the Debtors had outstanding funded debt obligations in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $37.91 million, and related interest and accruals. Additionally, as of the Petition Date, the Debtors had an estimated $20.5mn of outstanding accounts payable, on an unsecured basis, to vendors, customers, service providers, and landlords. The Debtors’ pro forma exit capital structure will consist of (a) the Exit L/C Facility (equal to up to $10,000,000 or such lesser amount agreed by the Reorganized Debtors), (b) the Exit Term Loan (equal to the lesser of (i) $30,000,000 less 90% of the Net Sale Proceeds, if any, in excess of $2,500,000 (excluding any proceeds from the sale of RT Lodge) and (ii) 1.2 times the agreed Broker’s Opinion of Value of the Debtors’ real property) and (c) New Common Shares in RT Asset Company:
- FN2 Dollar amounts are in millions and do not include accrued and unpaid interest, fees, expenses and other obligations.
- FN3 Amount consists of Existing Letters of Credit in the approximate amount of $9.55 million and prepetition revolving loan advance of $2 million.
Updated Proposed Key Dates
Liquidation Analysis (see Exhibit D of Amended Disclosure Statement [Docket No. 749] for Analysis Assumptions)
About the Debtors
According to the Debtors: “Founded in 1972 in Knoxville, Tennessee, Ruby Tuesday, Inc., is dedicated to delighting guests with exceptional casual dining experiences that offer uncompromising quality paired with passionate service every time they visit. From signature handcrafted burgers to the farm-grown goodness of the Endless Garden Bar, Ruby Tuesday is proud of its long-standing history as an American classic and international favorite for nearly 50 years. The Company currently owns, operates and franchises casual dining restaurants in the United States, Guam, and five foreign countries under the Ruby Tuesday® brand.”
Read more Bankruptcy News